Private Equity Hits the Brakes on Riskiest Types of Controversial Loans

Private Equity Hits the Brakes on Riskiest Types of Controversial Loans

(Bloomberg) — For years, buyout firms used controversial loans backed by their equity stakes to juice up returns in their funds. After attracting criticism from some of the same investors the practice was supposed to benefit, they are hitting the brakes.

Most Read from Bloomberg

Net-asset-value loans, which layer extra leverage onto private companies already carrying heavy debt, have come under scrutiny, especially when buyout firms use them to fund distributions rather than growth. Many firms borrowed against their portfolio companies to keep the private market bonanza alive while deal-making withered.

With even investors on the receiving end of those payouts flagging concern, there are moves afoot to shift how NAV loans are being spent. Ares Management Corp., Perpetual Investors and 17Capital all say NAV loans are increasingly being reinvested into portfolio companies or used to make add-on acquisitions, rather than fund payouts.

In part, it points to a shift in the balance of power that’s allowing investors in private equity funds such as pension funds, known as limited partners or LPs, to hold sway over private equity managers known as general partners or GPs.

“Using NAV loans for distributions is somewhat like kicking the can down the road,” said Christian Wiehenkamp, chief investment officer of Perpetual Investors. “LPs don’t seem to like that and since GPs are no longer calling the shots without respecting the nature of a longer partnership, GPs seem to have listened.”

While NAV loans have existed for more than a decade, they became a crutch for PE firms during a recent deal drought, helping to drum up cash they’d normally have found from asset sales. Now totaling about $50 billion, according to estimates from Ares, NAV loans have elicited warnings from regulators concerned their risks could spread through the financial system.

There’s a risk that the loans weaken portfolio companies, and that, even if they puff up returns at first, they dilute them in the long run.

“I’m sure there are some LPs who would have loved to get distributions through any means they could over the past couple of years,” said David Wilson, a partner at 17Capital, a leading provider of NAV loans. “Other investors who are sitting on a lot of cash may see this as an expensive way to get cash back.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *